Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Maryland typically spent more money on men’s soccer recruiting than Indiana from 2015-2019. Was it worth it?

From 2015-2019, Maryland averaged higher recruiting class rankings than Indiana

Smoke machines burst on either side of the goal, as Maryland players mobbed Amar Sedjic, their team captain. His penalty kick had just served as the lone 1-0 score in the 2018 NCAA National Championship match — the team's fourth title in program history. 

Maryland is still the latest Big Ten team to hoist the College Cup, spoiling Indiana's chances with a victory in that year's Final Four. Historically, Indiana doubles Maryland's national trophy count, yet since 2012, hasn't claimed another College Cup.

One explanation for Maryland's recent title may be its elevated recruiting spending. The financial reports that universities must submit to the NCAA — obtained via a series of public records requests — reveal that from 2015-2019, Indiana lagged behind its rival in recruiting expenses. 

During those five years, Maryland expended $213,401 on men's soccer recruiting — quite an advantage compared to Indiana's expenses of $156,126. The gap in recruiting costs becomes even starker when you compare the totals to each University's broader athletic budgets. 

IU-MD recruiting

Maryland's men's soccer recruiting expenses of $213,401, amounted to 3.45% of the school's $6,188,123 recruiting expenditures across all collegiate sports. Indiana only directed $156,126 toward the same sport, 1.61% of its $9,672,654 recruiting costs across all collegiate sports. 

While Indiana consistently possesses more money to spend than Maryland does, Indiana's athletic department has never spent as lavishly on men's soccer. Perhaps, as a result, Maryland averaged higher recruiting class rankings than Indiana within College Soccer News and Top Drawer Soccer — two leading sources for national soccer recruiting rankings. 

Sejdic, the Most Outstanding Offensive Player of the 2018 College Cup, was a member of Maryland's No. 1 recruiting class back in 2015, according to College Soccer News. So was senior Sebastian Elney, who tallied the game-winning goal over Kentucky to advance to the Final Four. 

On the other side of the bracket, Indiana senior Austin Panchot scored the game-winning goal to advance the Hoosiers to the Final Four. The assist came from fellow senior Andrew Gutman, that year's MAC Hermann Trophy winner, an award handed to the nation's best collegiate soccer player. 

In 2015, when Sejdic and Gutman were freshmen, Maryland spent $30,663 on men's soccer recruiting, 3.51% of its $873,820 recruiting expenditures across all collegiate sports. Indiana closely spent $27,366, yet that was only 1.56% of its more than double $1,754,750 recruiting expenses. Indiana claimed the No. 17 recruiting class, according to College Soccer News.

In each year from 2015-2019, less than 2% of Indiana University's total recruiting expenditures were directed toward men's soccer. Meanwhile, Maryland only dipped below 2% during one of the five years. So let's investigate that one year in 2016. 

Maryland expended $21,844 on men's soccer recruiting, just 1.79% of its $1,218,509 total recruiting expenses, yet still claimed the No. 3 recruiting class, according to Top Drawer Soccer. Indiana spent $25,768, 1.72% of its total $1,502,405 recruiting expenses, and was slotted No. 20 by the same publication. That's only a 0.07% difference — the closest of any year between the two programs — and there's still a wide ranking gap.

What if we now look at a year with a greater percentage difference? Indiana spent $48,863 on men's soccer recruiting in 2019 — 1.95% of its overall recruiting costs — its highest percentage from 2015-2019. And it churned into the team's highest-ranked recruiting class within that span, which was ranked No. 2 in the nation, according to TDS. 

The signing class included two players now in Major League Soccer — Victor Bezerra, a MAC Hermann Trophy runner-up in 2020-21, and Roman Celentano, the first-ever two-time Big Ten Goalkeeper of the Year. 

Pivoting back to Maryland, the Terrapins spent $63,355 on men's soccer recruiting in 2019 — 4.42% of its total recruiting expenses — yet produced the No. 20 class, according to TDS. 

IU-MD graphic.png

So, what's the trend? Well, Indiana's linear path is clear. Indiana garnered its highest-ranking recruiting class the season it spent the most in 2019. Yet, Maryland's correlation between men's soccer recruiting expenses and class rankings vary. During the year Maryland spent the lowest percentage on men's soccer recruiting in five seasons, it still maintained the No. 3 class. 

Sure, from 2015-2019, Maryland averaged higher recruiting class rankings than Indiana within the same publication. But the Terrapins also endured shorter-lasting runs in the NCAA Tournament. Besides 2015 and 2018, Maryland didn't reach the Sweet 16. The Hoosiers hit the same benchmark, or past it, all five seasons. 

Perhaps Indiana fans can be content that the program didn't allocate as much of its total recruiting expenses toward men's soccer — yet typically reached farther in the postseason across 2015-2019. But, the Hoosiers also aren't the ones holding the most recent NCAA trophy at their facility.

Powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News
All Content © 2024 Hoosier Network